<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arrowsmith: Still Not Done</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alongwithahammer.com/2008/11/21/arrowsmith-still-not-done/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alongwithahammer.com/2008/11/21/arrowsmith-still-not-done/</link>
	<description>Classic books, modern take, no surrender.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 03:18:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwrosenzweig</title>
		<link>http://alongwithahammer.com/2008/11/21/arrowsmith-still-not-done/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jwrosenzweig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 05:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alongwithahammer.wordpress.com/?p=164#comment-463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, we seem to have had incredibly similar experiences with this one!  I certainly agree about the condescension, but also your comments about Lewis&#039;s talent (which only made his failings all the more frustrating, for me).  I don&#039;t know that I&#039;d agree, though, that Martin Arrowsmith is so one-dimensional.  I thought there was more to him than any of the other characters (pretty much all of them flat and undeveloped), and I thought he therefore had an appeal, even a limited likeability.  I didn&#039;t get frustrated as early as you did, at least.  

And I know what you mean about how most of these authors seem to condescend to their characters (though not Wharton, my one shining star and the reason I press onward with hope).  Is this a consistent theme in 1920s literature, or are the Pulitzer Committee&#039;s tastes steering us in this direction (and if so, why?)?  I haven&#039;t read enough outside of this Pulitzer quest to know if this is characteristic of the age or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, we seem to have had incredibly similar experiences with this one!  I certainly agree about the condescension, but also your comments about Lewis&#8217;s talent (which only made his failings all the more frustrating, for me).  I don&#8217;t know that I&#8217;d agree, though, that Martin Arrowsmith is so one-dimensional.  I thought there was more to him than any of the other characters (pretty much all of them flat and undeveloped), and I thought he therefore had an appeal, even a limited likeability.  I didn&#8217;t get frustrated as early as you did, at least.  </p>
<p>And I know what you mean about how most of these authors seem to condescend to their characters (though not Wharton, my one shining star and the reason I press onward with hope).  Is this a consistent theme in 1920s literature, or are the Pulitzer Committee&#8217;s tastes steering us in this direction (and if so, why?)?  I haven&#8217;t read enough outside of this Pulitzer quest to know if this is characteristic of the age or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreadful Penny</title>
		<link>http://alongwithahammer.com/2008/11/21/arrowsmith-still-not-done/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dreadful Penny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alongwithahammer.wordpress.com/?p=164#comment-130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know that I&#039;ve ever read a more interminable novel, and I can&#039;t say I would have pushed as far into it as I have (270ish pages!) without insisting that it be the only book that I carry with me and that I always stay on the local when I take the train. Even with those restrictions, I&#039;ve still chosen to catnap over read even five more pages of Arrowsmith more often than not. 

&quot;Hectoring&quot; is the perfect word for Lewis&#039;s tone; I just want there to be a character in this book that he genuinely admires as an author and is willing to cut a freakin&#039; break. Maybe this is a really accurate portrait of a main character who consistently manages to render himself unlikeable. 

Also, slang, even if captured accurately, does not age well. I can&#039;t help but wonder if the author is prettying up dialogue that, in any age, would actually have been full of f-bombs. Otherwise, it&#039;s like the line in The Music Man about &quot;gee whiz&quot; and &quot;so&#039;s your old man.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know that I&#8217;ve ever read a more interminable novel, and I can&#8217;t say I would have pushed as far into it as I have (270ish pages!) without insisting that it be the only book that I carry with me and that I always stay on the local when I take the train. Even with those restrictions, I&#8217;ve still chosen to catnap over read even five more pages of Arrowsmith more often than not. </p>
<p>&#8220;Hectoring&#8221; is the perfect word for Lewis&#8217;s tone; I just want there to be a character in this book that he genuinely admires as an author and is willing to cut a freakin&#8217; break. Maybe this is a really accurate portrait of a main character who consistently manages to render himself unlikeable. </p>
<p>Also, slang, even if captured accurately, does not age well. I can&#8217;t help but wonder if the author is prettying up dialogue that, in any age, would actually have been full of f-bombs. Otherwise, it&#8217;s like the line in The Music Man about &#8220;gee whiz&#8221; and &#8220;so&#8217;s your old man.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

