In the interests of reviving the blog a bit, we’re making it a bit more relaxed and conversational, and incorporating some posts where we discuss our reactions to the book. We’re thinking of doing these like a real podcast soon, but first we’ve got some kinks to work out. (Like, say, learning how to edit sound.) So here’s a transcript of our postmortem on Arrowsmith.
We open with Penny reporting her encounter with an actual reference to Arrowsmith in pop culture:
Dreadful Penny: ….it was a naughty joke that Hawkeye was telling.
Diablevert: About Arrowsmith? What was the context?
Penny: It was an early M*A*S*H episode, and Hawkeye was like, making out with a nurse in a naughty way, and Trapper comes in and asks about some naughty pictures, Hawkeye’s like, “I don’t know what you’re talking about.” And Trapper’s like, “Well, why did I find them before, behind your copy of Arrowsmith?” That’s hysterical. Such a great character note for Hawkeye. Of course he would have this copy of Arrowsmith, this doctor character who wanted to do good in the world, and save everyone, and thought he was kind of a savior. So: Thank you for enriching my knowledge of M*A*S*H, Sinclair Lewis. Or not even Sinclair Lewis. The Pulitzer committee.
Dv: Do you think that’s part of the problem with some of these books, that they’ve passed out of culture in a way?
Penny: Yeah, I think they definitely have. They’re books that time has forgot, and authors that time has forgot. I’m part of the Pulitzer forum on GoodReads, and I watch it sometimes and sometimes people get really passionate about these books. They love them so much, and wish that everybody read them. And I get that sense as we read them that they’re very much of a time, and you can’t really understand that time unless you experience — like, to be fully immersed in a time when the automobile was a seismic shift in culture.
Dv: That’s one of the things I sort of appreciate about them in the aggregate. The sense that it gives you, little details that you see repeated again and again — like they way in which soft coal apparently made living in cities at that time like a being in fucking coal pit. That’s not something that you’d every really pick up on from watching movies, or hearing stuff about that time, you don’t really imagine it that way.
Penny: And genuine skepticism about the automobile actually taking hold is kind of interesting. They’re all so scared of the car. But they’re all bildungsromans. And I wish that would….stop. Like a lot.
Dv: Yeah, we haven’t had a romance, really, except Age of Innocence.
Penny: I guess The Able McLaughlins was kind of a romance. That was definitely a book that time has justly forgot.
Dv: Oh, that was fucking terrible.
Penny: Yeah. I think The Able McLaughlins and Arrowsmith can both go down in history as books that almost killed our blog.
Dv: Yeah.
Penny: They were brutal.
Dv: The Able McLaughlins was at least more digestible, I feel like.
Penny: It was shorter.
Dv: Yeah, that’s pretty much what I mean. Is that it was much shorter. And an easier book to blow through, because it wasn’t terribly well-written. You know what I mean? So you were just like, “uh-hunh, uh-hunh, uh-hunh, whatever.” With Arrowsmith, it was more dense and just went on for fucking ever.
Penny: I guess Arrowsmith was more dense… of course, it was better written.
Dv: You’re forgetting how terrible The Able McLaughlins was, in my opinion. It was awful.
Penny: But Arrowsmith was so snide, in just an unpleasant way, in a way that I didn’t feel like I was participating in. I felt like Sinclair Lewis just hated everyone. In the world.
Dv: Yes.
Penny: So completely misanthropic.
Dv: I don’t know if he hated people. He just thought he was smarter than them. That’s been interesting, because one of the things he has contempt for has been a running theme in a couple of the books. The idea of this—I think he captures his time very well—this whole civic boosterism bit. Pep. Talking things up. All that shit. It was in The Magnificent Ambersons, one of the first books, that whole idea of—
Penny: Spirit and civic-mindedness.
Dv: And that’s something that’s not well-remembered.
Penny: The reputation of the upper-crust.
Dv: But also of the town. The idea of having this whole community of people being patriotic in a very local way. Which I think he captured well. But it’s really annoying to read about, because he has such contempt for all these people that display that quality.
Penny: But that’s what makes all of these books so xenophobic in that way, though. Because it is the pep, and this town spirit, and then there’s the encroaching city. And the fear of immigration comes into that. Nearly every book is about small towns disintegrating. Or even big cities, like in the Age of Innocence.
Dv: Do you know what’s funny? It’s sort of the weirdest thing. When I think back on it, the very first one we read was — what was the name of that?
Penny: His Family.
Dv: Thank you. In some ways, it was one of the most sophisticated ones. Because it had the fucking flapper, and was talking about the problems of the inner, urban city, and it had this chick, the daughter, who was like a Wobblie or whatever—
Penny: The reformer! Yeah.
Dv: Right. So even though it was a terribly-written book, in many ways—just leaden prose—but in terms of issues and the themes it was dealing with, in comparison to some of the other ones I think it had a different take. All the other ones, all of them are obsessed with this final conquering-of-the-frontier shit, which just seems so irrelevant at the moment.
Penny: Exactly.
Dv: The fucking prairie was fucking killing me. It was just like, three books and we were stuck in the goddamn wheat fields, and it we can’t, like…
Penny: Yeah. But there was also a genuine New Woman, in His Family, and the women in most of these books were…pretty contemptible.
Dv chuckles.
Penny: The female characters in Arrowsmith were like Leora, who just waited for no reason, and had bad grammar, in a kind of endearing way.
Dv: I like her better though, than some of the other female characters in that book. I agree that she — everyone in the book was treated with contempt. So I think she actually probably gets more credit than a lot of characters do. Because she sticks up for herself. She’s given that.
Penny: I guess that’s true. And he probably wasn’t expecting that much more of her, because he was probably a misogynist, so
Dv: He’s very chauvinist. I agree that he thinks Leora knows her place and that he thinks that’s a good thing. But in comparison to all the other characters—she rebels against her family. When they try and stop her from marrying Martin, she’s like fuck you, I don’t want to put up with your bullshit — in a very 19th century way that wouldn’t use words like that…
Penny: But she’s also like…. “Screw you, I’m not going to put up with all your nonsense, I’m …just going to sit at home and wait for you.”
Dv: Yeah, but it’s sort of like—
Penny: “But I’m going to wait, always, for you!”
Dv: Okay. One of the most irritating episodes in Arrowsmith is the pseudo-affair he has, where he gets bored with his job and starts macking on the daughter of his boss.
Penny: Of the booster? Pickerbaugh?
Dv: Yeah. Which, talk about shitting where you eat. But anyway. That whole thing is really dumb. But Leora’s attitude toward it is interesting, because she’s just like, “You’re being a dumbfuck. Get over it.” And that in itself is interesting, because it’s passive in that she just sort of sits there waiting for him. But…he’s being a dumbfuck. And he really just needs to get over it. Would you have wanted him, to…?
Penny: It didn’t ruin their marriage, it didn’t send them into divorce.
Dv: It was so petty, and tiny, and she could see that. She could see his limitations, in way that some of the other characters don’t. His second wife wants him to be a great man and all this bullshit, and that’s essentially what they break over. Whereas Leora sees past his bullshit and likes him anyway, which is why I feel like they made a good match. There’s a fair bit of depth to that writing in some ways, but there was just such a contempt, that reigned over everything, and made it very difficult to read because you didn’t care for the characters.
Penny: It was a book that seemed pleasingly accurate in its attention to the small details of its time and I appreciated that. But there was also a lot about science in it that we don’t accept anymore. And I think that just frustrating, and was something that very much dated that book. There was a lot of, “and then they discovered molecules!” And while I can appreciate what it was like to live at a time when nobody knew what a molecule was, it is kind of tedious to look back on that, and read that.
Dv: Oh, really? That’s interesting. That didn’t bother me. It did get a little technical, and that dragged a bit. But for me it was interesting because it was like the car bits, in that you forget this stuff was ever new.
Penny: I felt that way to a certain extent. But there was just so much of it in the book that it was obsessive.
Dv: Whatever Lewis is doing, he get so wrapped up in it. You can tell that with writers, when they’ve done all this research, and it’s like, “here’s 19 pages that explain exactly how this process works that have nothing to do with the goddamn plot.” And you’re just like: Dude. There was a bit of that, yeah. But I just didn’t see what his overall point was, in a lot of ways.
Penny: What do you mean?
Dv: The whole essential conflict in the book is Arrowsmith being the man of science and everything tries to pull him away from being this scientific researcher genius who’s purely pursuing science’s ends and not really even caring for the individual as per the individual, but only looking to discover the true principals of how all this shit works, and eventually, broadly, that will be good for the race. I think Lewis approves of all this, but it’s kind of hard to tell sometimes.
Penny: I don’t know if he approved of it, if you extrapolate to the plague stuff. The idea there was that he was going to conduct this perfect experiment, but then can’t, can’t bring himself to do it, because he’s too moved by human suffering. And not only human suffering in the abstract, but by his own suffering. So he loses his wife — spoiler alert!
Dv laughs.
Penny: I feel ridiculous, but sometimes talking about these books, I feel like “Sorry if we ruined that book for you. It was ruined for me in the first ten pages. By starting it.” So…no, it’s cool, Arrowsmith’s good, or not…
Dv: No, it’s not.
Penny: But I think the point of it was that humanism did intrude, that you can’t get past that humanism. You can’t in a purely scientific way. I think that was Lewis’ point.
Dv: See, I don’t know. I’m not sure about it because it doesn’t seem that way from the reaction of the characters. It was more like, Arrowsmith was really fucking depressed and gave up on everything, and became like, “Fuck. Fuck the experiment. I don’t give a fuck.” Lewis didn’t really give him a clear moment of “I reject my former principals, and now see that I was being blind to suffering.” He’s just sort of like, “Fuck it. My wife died. Who cares? Whatever you want to do, it’s fine.” Which might have been more realistic about how a person would actually behave in that situation.